Skip to main content

The Hours Michael Cunningham

On the face of it The Hours is a very boring book.


It follows 3 seemingly unconnected women over the course of a day. It is set over 3 different periods of time in America and England. One woman is trying to write a book (Virginia Woolf), one is trying to bake a cake (Laura Brown) and one is trying to organise a party (Clarissa Dalloway). Clarissa is loosely based on Mrs Dalloway the Woolf character from the book by the same name. I am told the book is written in the 'stream of conscious' style where the reader follows the womens thoughts as they enter their head however random. Nothing much else happens.


Bit of a failure then really and that seemed to be the thoughts of about half the members at this months meeting.


However have book must discuss! So we delved in and discovered that when you look closely and pool ideas it suddenly becomes more interesting. Like a many layered onion that first appears only dull and brown. I liked that sentence it made me feel posh!


We discovered that all women who at first glance had nothing in common do in fact have a lot in common. For example all three are playing a role. Virginia as the sane wife who can write and run a successful household, Laura who is playing the perfect mother and Clarissa who is playing the perfect hostess. They all feel that they have to perform, to put on a brave face and they all feel like they are failing.

They are all trying to exert control over their lives by creating the perfect something - a book, a cake and a party. Do they see this as replicas of themselves and their lives? Clarissa seems more certain than others that the party will be ok is it because she is happiest with her life? Laura seems the least happy with her creation. Are they measuring up how perfect they are by what they produce? Is it their way of issuing some control? Was it always going to be not perfect in their eyes because they feel they are not perfect?


We were really warming up now questions and theories were being posed all over the place. Not so boring now hey? But wait there is more



All three have issues with Mental illness. Whereas Virginia looks on the face of it as thought she is the most obviously mentally disturbed one member of the group commented how it could be that she suffered from migraines. Indeed a lot of the descriptions we are offered would fit that diagnosis. Clarissa although not suffering herself is having to deal with her best friend Richard who is losing his mind to aids. Laura also seems to be suffering from some sort of depression, perhaps post natal depression? We then talked about whether the women were all suffering from illnesses that in todays environment would be treatable and recoverable from rather than dominating their lives. Looking to modern day just like Laura and Virginia are unable to escape their illnesses Richard despite modern medicine is unable to escape his.



The last link we found was lesbianism. All 3 either were openly or had some sort of lesbian encounter. Why? Is it because they feel they have to be perfect in front of the men and with women they don't?



We also discussed to what extent Clarissa was more free than the others. She to some extent shows you can have it all, a lesbian relationship, a child, an upper class life style with a glamorous circle of friends. But she lives in New York one of the most eclectic, accepting cities in the world. Would she have this freedom if she lived in say Richmond?


At last then a book club book that really was made for a book club. We ended up talking for ages and everyone said they actually got something out of the meeting, appreciating the book more. Some of us even increased the score they would have given it had it not been for the book club! Overall we gave it a 6. Some gave it as low as a 2 some as high as an 8. I seem to think that this book has split us the most score wise than any other previously. I think this is a good thing in a book club book.


Perhaps we got more out of this book because it is more wordy/high brow than others previously. Although it scored relatively low and I would say I didn't enjoy it anywhere near as much as most books I've read it's quite readable and I got way more out of it than most of our other books. Try it.




Next book is The Slap by Christos Tsiolkas



PS Check out my annual review!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mount by Jilly Cooper #inbetweeny

I'll start this blog with a warning, this post does contain spoilers. So if you haven't read the book then please don't read this blog, yet. Of course you should read this post just wait a little while until you've read the latest installment of Rupert Campbell Black (RCB). Warnings out of the way I'll begin. I was massively looking forward to reading this book having hugely enjoyed the previous ones. RCB is my (not so) secret trashy pleasure and has been for many years. This book had all the ingredients of a classic, pages of wonderfully named characters, a few tortured souls and of course RCB with all his horses, dogs and now grandchildren. The book got off to a good start full of characters from old but also plenty of new ones to mix it up a bit. The horse's really played a starring role in this book but I also really loved Gav and at first Gala. Yep only at first as she went strongly down hill and I bet you can guess why. RCB. Here is where I fell o

Stitch Up (A Best Defence Mystery) by William McIntyre #BlogTour

OK hold on everybody for MY FIRST EVER BLOG TOUR!!!!!!!!! Did I like it? Did I manage to read it in time? Did I forget to post my review when I should have done? Yes, yes and (thankfully) no! Stitch Up is the ninth in the Best Defence Series featuring Scottish defence lawyer Robbie Munro. As a solicitor not a policeman who successfully runs his own law firm, is recently married and has a daughter the book immediately set itself apart from your standard crime thriller. The book begins with Robbie's ex girlfriend asking him to investigate the apparent suicide of her new boyfriend (awkward!). At the same time a convicted child-murderer is attempting to have his conviction quashed (if I remember the term correctly Mr McIntyre?) claiming Robbie's dad ex sergeant Alex Munro planted key evidence at the scene of the crime (double awkward!). I liked the two stories running along side each other which kept the pace of the book moving swiftly forwards. In real life McIntyre is

Vanity Fair by William Makepeace Thackeray and a 30 a day habit.

Nothing like challenging oneself in the New Year and rather than giving up alcohol and only eating steamed kale the Book Club decided on reading the 900 odd page doorstop that is Vanity Fair . I ordered it at once and (using something vaguely like maths) worked out I needed to read 30 pages a day to have it read in time for the meeting. I was surprisingly undeterred by this and thought if nothing else I could use the book as a dumbbell when working off the chocolate orange.   I found I actually liked hitting my 30 a day target (much like all the other New Years' resolutioners like hitting their ten thousand steps) and it motivated me to just squeeze a few more pages in here and there so I was ahead of target. I haven’t really approached a book this way before but then it is longer than my copy of War and Peace and there are over 50 books on my bookshelf waiting to be read (now in 'to read' order due to much prating about over Christmas).        I didn’t know anything a